Minimizing Costs and Expanding Resources for On-Premises Networks

Optimal Solution for Expanding Resources on On-Premises Networks

Prev Question Next Question

Question

You have an on-premises network that contains 100 servers.

You need to recommend a solution that provides additional resources to your users. The solution must minimize capital and operational expenditure costs.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

D

A hybrid cloud is a combination of a private cloud and a public cloud.

Capital expenditure is the spending of money up-front for infrastructure such as new servers.

With a hybrid cloud, you can continue to use the on-premises servers while adding new servers in the public cloud (Azure for example). Adding new servers in

Azure minimizes the capital expenditure costs as you are not paying for new servers as you would if you deployed new server on-premises.

Incorrect Answers:

A: A complete migration of 100 servers to the public cloud would involve a lot of operational expenditure (the cost of migrating all the servers).

B: An additional data center would involve a lot of capital expenditure (the cost of the new infrastructure).

C: A private cloud is hosted on on-premises servers to this would involve a lot of capital expenditure (the cost of the new infrastructure to host the private cloud).

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/learn/modules/principles-cloud-computing/4-cloud-deployment-models

The recommended solution for providing additional resources to users while minimizing capital and operational expenditure costs depends on several factors such as the business requirements, budget, and IT infrastructure. In this scenario, we have an on-premises network with 100 servers, and we need to recommend a solution that provides additional resources to users while minimizing costs.

Option A: a complete migration to the public cloud Migrating to the public cloud can provide a scalable and cost-effective solution for providing additional resources to users. Cloud providers such as Microsoft Azure offer a variety of services such as virtual machines, databases, and storage, which can be provisioned on-demand and pay-as-you-go basis. However, a complete migration to the public cloud may require significant upfront costs for migrating data, applications, and infrastructure to the cloud, and ongoing operational costs for managing the cloud resources.

Option B: an additional data center Building an additional data center can provide additional resources to users, but it may not be the most cost-effective solution. Building and maintaining a data center requires significant capital expenditures, and ongoing operational costs for managing the data center. Additionally, building an additional data center may not provide the scalability and flexibility needed to meet changing business requirements.

Option C: a private cloud A private cloud can provide the scalability and flexibility of the public cloud while maintaining the control and security of on-premises infrastructure. Private clouds can be built using virtualization technologies such as VMware or Hyper-V, and can be integrated with public cloud services for hybrid cloud scenarios. However, building a private cloud requires significant upfront costs for hardware, software, and infrastructure, and ongoing operational costs for managing the private cloud resources.

Option D: a hybrid cloud A hybrid cloud provides the best of both worlds, combining the scalability and flexibility of the public cloud with the control and security of the private cloud. A hybrid cloud allows organizations to leverage existing on-premises infrastructure while also utilizing public cloud services for additional resources. This can minimize capital and operational expenditure costs while providing additional resources to users as needed.

Conclusion: Based on the scenario described, a hybrid cloud solution is the recommended solution for providing additional resources to users while minimizing capital and operational expenditure costs. It allows the organization to leverage existing on-premises infrastructure while also utilizing public cloud services as needed, providing the flexibility and scalability required to meet changing business requirements.

The solution of syncing all Active Directory user accounts to Azure Active Directory is a valid approach towards reducing the impact on users during a migration of on-premises resources to Azure. Therefore, the answer is A) Yes, the solution meets the goal.

When a user's account is synced from Active Directory to Azure AD, the user can seamlessly access resources in both on-premises and cloud environments. Therefore, once the migration to Azure is complete, users can continue accessing resources without experiencing any downtime or interruption.

Syncing Active Directory user accounts to Azure AD enables an organization to take advantage of Azure AD's identity and access management features, such as Single Sign-On (SSO) and multi-factor authentication (MFA), providing enhanced security and streamlined user experience.

In summary, syncing Active Directory user accounts to Azure AD is a valid approach towards reducing the impact on users during a migration of on-premises resources to Azure. It provides a seamless transition for users, ensures security, and enhances user experience.