An organization is already certified to an international security standard.
Which mechanism would BEST help to further align the organization with other data security regulatory requirements as per new business needs?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.C.
Gap analysis would help identify the actual gaps between the desired state and the current implementation of information security management.
BIA is primarily used for business continuity planning.
Technical vulnerability assessment is used for detailed assessment of technical controls, which would come later in the process and would not provide complete information in order to identify gaps.
The BEST mechanism to further align an organization with other data security regulatory requirements would be a gap analysis (Option C).
A gap analysis involves evaluating the current state of an organization's security controls against a particular set of requirements or standards, identifying any gaps or deficiencies, and developing a plan to address them. In this case, the organization is already certified to an international security standard, but there may be other data security regulatory requirements that the organization needs to comply with, depending on its business needs.
By conducting a gap analysis, the organization can identify any areas where it falls short of the new requirements and take steps to address those gaps. This can involve updating policies and procedures, implementing new controls or technologies, or providing additional training to employees.
KPIs (Option A) are metrics used to measure the performance of an organization or specific processes. While they can be useful for tracking progress toward security goals, they are not well-suited to identifying gaps in compliance with regulatory requirements.
Business impact analysis (Option B) is a process of evaluating the potential impact of disruptions to an organization's operations. While this can be useful for identifying critical assets and processes that need to be protected, it is not directly related to compliance with regulatory requirements.
Technical vulnerability assessment (Option D) is a process of identifying vulnerabilities in an organization's technical systems and infrastructure. While this can be useful for improving the overall security posture of the organization, it is not directly related to compliance with regulatory requirements.
In summary, a gap analysis is the best option for aligning an organization with new data security regulatory requirements, as it provides a systematic approach to identifying and addressing any gaps or deficiencies.