While troubleshooting an AToM L2VPN service, a network consultant notices that the AC Layer 2 encapsulations are different.
Which action should the consultant take in order to make the MPLS L2VPN work?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.D.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_l2_vpns/configuration/xe-16-11/mp-l2-vpns-xe-16-11-book/l2vpn-interworking.htmlIn this scenario, the network consultant has identified that the Attachment Circuit (AC) Layer 2 encapsulations are different, which means that the Layer 2 frames from the AC cannot be transported over the MPLS network as is. This situation requires the use of Layer 2 VPN services over MPLS, such as Any Transport over MPLS (AToM) to enable the transport of Layer 2 frames across the MPLS network.
The correct action to take in this scenario is to use interworking to ensure that the different Layer 2 encapsulations can be transported over the MPLS network. Interworking is the process of converting between different Layer 2 encapsulation types.
Option A, "tag-rewrite on the ingress and egress PE router," is incorrect because tag-rewrite only works for MPLS Layer 3 VPNs, not Layer 2 VPNs.
Option B, "interworking IP configuration on the last PE router before label disposition," is incorrect because it is not necessary to have an IP interworking configuration for a Layer 2 VPN service.
Option D, "interworking IP configuration on both the AC terminations on the PEs," is also incorrect because it is not necessary to configure IP interworking for a Layer 2 VPN service.
Therefore, the correct answer is C, "nonrouted interworking setup to properly translate only the Layer 2 information from the AC." Nonrouted interworking involves translating only the Layer 2 information from the AC, without any routing or IP encapsulation, to ensure that the Layer 2 frames can be transported across the MPLS network. This type of interworking is typically used for Ethernet-based services, such as Ethernet over MPLS (EoMPLS) or AToM.