Independent Audit for AML/CFT Program | CAMS Exam Question Answer

Independent Audit for an AML/CFT Program

Prev Question Next Question

Question

To ensure the independence of an audit for an AML/CFT program, those involved in the audit would best be described as being:

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

C

To ensure the independence of an audit for an AML/CFT (Anti-Money Laundering/Combating the Financing of Terrorism) program, it is important that the individuals involved in the audit are independent and objective. The purpose of an audit is to provide an unbiased assessment of an organization's AML/CFT compliance program, and any conflicts of interest or perceived biases can undermine the integrity of the audit process.

Option A states that the individuals involved in the audit should not be involved in the organization's AML/CFT compliance program and have a reporting line to the organization's CEO. This is not an ideal solution because the individuals may have loyalty to the CEO, which could lead to potential conflicts of interest. This could compromise the independence and objectivity of the audit.

Option B suggests that the individuals involved in the audit should not be involved in the organization's STR/SAR (Suspicious Transaction Report/Suspicious Activity Report) filing process, and they should have a reporting line to the board of directors or committee thereof. This option is more appropriate as it ensures that the individuals are independent and objective. By not being involved in the STR/SAR filing process, they will not be influenced by any prior decisions made in the organization regarding suspicious transactions or activities. Reporting to the board of directors or committee thereof ensures that the individuals are accountable to an independent body.

Option C states that the individuals involved in the audit should not be involved in the organization's STR/SAR filing process and have a reporting line to the organization's CEO. This option is not ideal because the reporting line to the CEO may create a conflict of interest, as the CEO may be influenced by the audit findings. This could result in an audit that is not objective or independent.

Option D suggests that the individuals involved in the audit should not be involved in the organization's AML/CFT compliance program and have a reporting line to the board of directors or committee thereof. This option is similar to Option B and is the correct answer. By not being involved in the AML/CFT compliance program, the individuals will not be influenced by any prior decisions made in the organization. Reporting to the board of directors or committee thereof ensures that the individuals are accountable to an independent body. This ensures that the audit is objective and independent, and the findings are unbiased.

In summary, the best answer is option D - not involved in the organization's AML/CFT compliance program and having a reporting line to the board of directors or committee thereof. This option ensures that the individuals involved in the audit are independent and objective, and there are no conflicts of interest or perceived biases.