You've created a Code Commit Repository in AWS.
You need to share the repository with the developers in your team.
Which of the following would be a secure and easier way to share the repository with the development team? Choose 2 answers from the options given below.
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.Answer - A and B.
The AWS Documentation mentions the following.
Your repository users must configure in the credential helper included in the AWS CLI.
But it is the only method available for root account or federated users.
Git credentials are the easiest method for users of your repository to set up and use.
SSH connections require your users to generate a public-private key pair, store the public key, associate the public key with their IAM user, configure their known hosts file on their local computer, and create and maintain a config file on their local computers.
Because this is a more complex configuration process, we recommend you choose HTTPS and Git credentials for connections to AWS CodeCommit.
The easiest way to set up AWS CodeCommit is to configure HTTPS Git credentials for AWS CodeCommit.
This HTTPS authentication method:
Uses a static user name and password.
Works with all operating systems supported by AWS CodeCommit.
Is also compatible with integrated development environments (IDEs) and other development tools that support Git credentials.
The simplest way to set up connections to AWS CodeCommit repositories is to configure Git credentials for AWS CodeCommit in the IAM console and then use those credentials for HTTPS connections.
For more information, please refer to the below URL-
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/setting-up-gc.htmlOptions C and D are incorrect because these are the least easy way to connect to the repository.
For more information on sharing a repository, please refer to the below URL-
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/codecommit/latest/userguide/how-to-share-repository.htmlSure, I'd be happy to help!
When it comes to sharing a CodeCommit repository with your development team, you want to make sure that the process is both secure and easy for your team members to use. There are a few options available to you, but the two that are considered the most secure and easy to use are:
A. Create Git credentials for the IAM users: You can create Git credentials for each member of your development team, which will allow them to securely access the repository. This involves creating IAM users for each team member, and then creating Git credentials for those users. Once the credentials are created, the developers can use them to authenticate with the repository and perform Git operations.
B. Allow the developers to connect via HTTPS using the Git credentials: You can also allow your team members to connect to the repository via HTTPS using the Git credentials. This involves creating Git credentials as described above, and then configuring the repository to allow HTTPS connections. Once this is done, the developers can clone the repository using the HTTPS URL and authenticate using the Git credentials.
C. Allow the developers to connect via SSH: While this is also a secure way to connect to the repository, it is not as easy to set up as the previous two options. This requires each team member to generate an SSH key pair, and then provide the public key to the repository owner. The repository owner would then need to add the public key to the repository's SSH keys list, which can be a cumbersome process. Once this is done, the developers can connect to the repository using the SSH URL.
D. Create a public-private key pair: While this is a secure option, it is not a recommended method for sharing a CodeCommit repository with your development team. This is because it involves sharing a private key with each team member, which can be a security risk. Additionally, this method is more difficult to set up than the other options listed above.
In summary, options A and B are the recommended methods for sharing a CodeCommit repository with your development team as they are both secure and easy to set up. Option C is also secure, but it can be a more difficult process to set up. Option D is not recommended due to the security risks involved.