A company is planning to use the AWS Redshift service.
The Redshift service and data on it would be used continuously for the next 3 years as per the current business plan.
What would be the most cost-effective solution in this scenario?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.Correct Answer - C.
AWS documentation mentions the following:
If you intend to keep your Amazon Redshift cluster running continuously for a prolonged period, you should consider purchasing reserved node offerings.
These offerings provide significant savings over on-demand pricing, but they require you to reserve compute nodes and commit to paying for those nodes for either a one-year or three-year duration.
For more information on Reserved Nodes in Redshift, please visit the following URL:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/mgmt/purchase-reserved-node-instance.htmlIn this scenario, the company plans to use AWS Redshift continuously for the next 3 years. The most cost-effective solution would be to consider using Reserved Instances for the Redshift Cluster.
Reserved Instances provide a significant discount compared to On-Demand instances, which are charged at a higher rate. By purchasing a Reserved Instance, the company can reserve capacity for the Redshift cluster for a specific period, typically for 1 or 3 years, at a lower hourly rate compared to On-Demand instances. This means that the company can save up to 75% on the hourly rate by using Reserved Instances.
Enabling automated backup is a best practice to ensure data durability and recoverability, but it does not directly impact the cost of using Redshift.
Considering not using a cluster for the Redshift nodes would not be practical, as Redshift is a columnar data store designed to work with large data sets, and a cluster provides scalability and fault tolerance.
Therefore, the most cost-effective solution for a company planning to use AWS Redshift continuously for the next 3 years is to consider using Reserved Instances for the Redshift Cluster.