An online streaming company is prohibited from broadcasting its content in certain countries and regions in the world.
Which Amazon Route 53 routing policy would be the most suitable in guaranteeing their compliance?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.Correct Answer - B.
Amazon Route 53 geolocation routing policy makes it possible for different types of content to be served depending on the browser's geographical location.
In this use case, the streaming company can serve a restriction message if Amazon Route 53 detects origin requests from prohibited countries.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-geoOption A is INCORRECT because geo-proximity allows for DNS traffic to be routed in accordance with a bias or preset preference rule.
This allows the user to be served with content from resources closest to their geographical location.
This routing manipulates DNS traffic flow only.
This routing policy is not the most suitable.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-geoproximityOption C is INCORRECT because a multi-value answer primarily addresses the quality of service and resources queried in DNS requests.
This routing policy is not the most suitable.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-multivalueOption D is INCORRECT because failover allows for the automatic switch to healthy DNS resources if another becomes unavailable.
It will not allow for the preferential serving of content based on the geographical location.
This routing policy is not the most suitable.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/routing-policy.html#routing-policy-multivalueThe most suitable Amazon Route 53 routing policy in guaranteeing compliance for an online streaming company that is prohibited from broadcasting its content in certain countries and regions in the world would be the Geolocation routing policy.
Geolocation routing policy allows you to route traffic based on the location of your users. It uses the location of the user's DNS resolver to determine the appropriate response to return. You can specify different responses based on the country or continent that the user is located in. This would allow the online streaming company to block access to their content for users located in the countries or regions where their content is prohibited.
The other routing policies mentioned are:
Geoproximity routing policy: This policy routes traffic based on the location of your resources and the location of your users. It is useful when you have resources that are geographically distributed, and you want to route traffic to the closest available resource. However, it is not useful in guaranteeing compliance as it does not allow for blocking traffic based on location.
Multi-value answer routing policy: This policy returns multiple values for a DNS query, which can be useful for load balancing or providing fault tolerance. However, it does not allow for blocking traffic based on location.
Failover routing policy: This policy is used to route traffic to a standby resource when the primary resource is unavailable. It is useful for high availability scenarios but does not allow for blocking traffic based on location.
Therefore, the most suitable Amazon Route 53 routing policy in guaranteeing compliance for an online streaming company that is prohibited from broadcasting its content in certain countries and regions in the world would be the Geolocation routing policy.