Your company wants to use an S3 bucket for web hosting but have several different domains to perform operations on the S3 content.
In the CORS configuration, you have added CORSRule AllowedOrigin for the following Domains.
http://www.domainnamea.com, https://www.secure.domainnamea.com, and http://www.domainnameb.com.
Following Domains, https://domainnameb.com and http://www.domainnameb.com:80, are not allowed to access the S3 bucket. What could be the most likely cause behind the unexpected access behaviour of the domains?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.Correct Answer: A.
Option A is correct.
The origin was configured as http://www.domainnameb.com, and a request was sent for https://domainnameb.com and http://www.domainnameb.com:80 instead of http://www.domainnameb.com.
The exact syntax must be matched.
In some cases, wildcards can be used to help the origin URLs.
Option B is incorrect.
This is not required to allow an origin domain to be included, although it can be.
Option C is incorrect.
The limit is 100.
Option D is incorrect.
The ACLs and policies continue to apply when you enable CORS on the bucket.
Verify that the Origin header in your request matches at least one of the AllowedOrigin elements in the specified CORSRule.
The scheme, the host, and the port values in the Origin request header must match the AllowedOrigin elements in the CORSRule.
For example, if you set the CORSRule to allow the origin http://www.example.com, then both https://www.example.com and http://www.example.com:80 origins in your request don't match the allowed origin in your configuration.
References:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/cors.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/apigateway/latest/developerguide/how-to-cors.html https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-S3-cross-origin-resource-sharing/The most likely cause behind the unexpected access behavior of the domains is that both the domains, https://domainnameb.com and http://www.domainnameb.com:80, do not match the allowed origins in the CORS configuration.
The CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) mechanism is used to control access to resources that are hosted on different domains. When a web page from one domain requests a resource from another domain, the browser sends a CORS request to the server hosting the resource. The server responds with the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header that specifies which domains are allowed to access the resource.
In this scenario, the CORS configuration allows access from http://www.domainnamea.com, https://www.secure.domainnamea.com, and http://www.domainnameb.com, but it does not allow access from https://domainnameb.com and http://www.domainnameb.com:80. The reason for this could be that the request from these domains does not match the allowed origins in the CORS configuration.
Option A is correct because it explains that the request from these domains does not match the allowed origins in the CORS configuration.
Option B is incorrect because HTTPS requests do not need to contain a specific port in the request.
Option C is incorrect because there is no limit to the number of origin sites that can access an S3 bucket.
Option D is incorrect because adding CORS to an S3 bucket does not automatically remove the S3 ACL and bucket policies.
In summary, the most likely cause behind the unexpected access behavior of the domains is that the request from these domains does not match the allowed origins in the CORS configuration.