Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
Your company has an Azure subscription that contains the following unused resources:
-> 20 user accounts in Azure Active Directory (Azure AD)
-> Five groups in Azure AD
-> 10 public IP addresses
-> 10 network interfaces
You need to reduce the Azure costs for the company.
Solution: You remove the unused user accounts.
Does this meet the goal?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B.B
You are not charged for user accounts. Therefore, deleting unused user accounts will not reduce the Azure costs for the company.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/advisor/advisor-cost-recommendations#reduce-costs-by-deleting-or-reconfiguring-idle-virtual-network-gatewaysBased on the provided scenario, the goal is to reduce Azure costs for the company. The proposed solution is to remove the unused user accounts. Let's analyze whether this solution meets the goal.
Removing unused user accounts can potentially reduce costs, but it may not be the most effective way to achieve significant cost savings. User accounts in Azure AD do not consume a substantial amount of resources or contribute significantly to the overall cost.
The resources that have a more direct impact on cost are the 10 public IP addresses and 10 network interfaces mentioned in the scenario. These resources are typically associated with virtual machines (VMs) or other network-related services. If these IP addresses and network interfaces are not actively used by any VMs or services, removing them would be a more effective cost-saving measure compared to removing user accounts.
Therefore, the proposed solution of removing the unused user accounts alone may not be sufficient to achieve the goal of reducing Azure costs. It is recommended to evaluate and consider removing the unused public IP addresses and network interfaces as well, as they are more likely to have a direct impact on cost savings.
In conclusion, the answer is B. No, removing the unused user accounts alone may not effectively reduce Azure costs. It would be advisable to also consider removing the unused public IP addresses and network interfaces to achieve the desired cost reduction.
Yes, the proposed solution to remove the unused user accounts would meet the goal of reducing Azure costs for the company.
The Azure subscription includes 20 user accounts in Azure AD, and if these accounts are not being used, they are likely taking up unnecessary licenses, which can add up in costs over time. Removing unused user accounts would free up these licenses, allowing the company to reduce its Azure costs.
It is important to note that removing user accounts should only be done after careful consideration and confirmation that they are truly unused. It is recommended to perform a regular audit of user accounts to ensure that they are still necessary, and to remove any that are no longer needed.
Additionally, while removing unused user accounts can help reduce costs, it is important to evaluate all unused resources in the Azure subscription to identify other areas for cost optimization. For example, the company can also consider removing the five groups in Azure AD, the 10 public IP addresses, and the 10 network interfaces if they are not being used. Regularly reviewing and optimizing the Azure resources can help ensure that the company is not paying for resources that are no longer needed or being used.