Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.
You plan to update the Azure DevOps strategy of your company.
You need to identify the following issues as they occur during the company's development process:
-> Licensing violations
-> Prohibited libraries
Solution: You implement automated security testing.
Does this meet the goal?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B.B
Instead use implement continuous integration.
Note: WhiteSource is the leader in continuous open source software security and compliance management. WhiteSource integrates into your build process, irrespective of your programming languages, build tools, or development environments. It works automatically, continuously, and silently in the background, checking the security, licensing, and quality of your open source components against WhiteSource constantly-updated definitive database of open source repositories.
https://azuredevopslabs.com/labs/vstsextend/whitesource/The solution provided, which is to implement automated security testing, can help to identify some security issues in the company's development process, including licensing violations and the use of prohibited libraries. However, it is not a complete solution for identifying all security issues that may occur in the development process.
Automated security testing is a type of testing that is performed automatically by a software tool. This testing can identify security issues in code, such as vulnerabilities, configuration errors, and insecure coding practices. Automated security testing can be integrated into the development process to identify security issues early and provide feedback to developers.
Regarding licensing violations, automated security testing can help to identify the use of open source libraries that may have licensing restrictions that the company is not aware of. However, it may not be able to identify all licensing violations, as some licensing issues may be related to how the company is using the software, rather than just the libraries that are being used.
Similarly, automated security testing can help to identify the use of prohibited libraries, but it may not be able to identify all prohibited libraries, especially if the company is not aware of them.
In conclusion, while implementing automated security testing is a good step towards identifying security issues in the development process, it is not a complete solution for identifying all licensing violations and prohibited libraries. It is important to combine automated security testing with other security measures, such as manual code reviews, security training for developers, and security audits.