Which Use Cases Exclude the Use of Identity Aware Proxy?

Correct Answer: D.

Option A is incorrect.

Identity Aware Proxy is suitable for the requirements that enforce access control policies for applications and resources.

Option B is incorrect.

Identity Aware Proxy is suitable to be used while working with signed headers to secure the app.

Option C is incorrect.

Identity Aware Proxy is suitable to be used when setting up group-based application access.

Option D is correct.

In this scenario, we should use BeyondCorp Enterprise instead of Identity Aware Proxy.

https://cloud.google.com/iap/docs/concepts-overview#when_to_use_iap https://cloud.google.com/beyondcorp-enterprise/docs/overview

Identity Aware Proxy (IAP) is a Google Cloud Platform (GCP) service that enables organizations to establish granular access controls for applications and resources hosted on GCP. IAP acts as a gateway between users and applications, ensuring that only authorized users can access resources.

To answer the question, we need to understand the use-cases for which IAP is typically used and identify the use-case that does not require IAP.

A. Requirement of enforcing access control policies for applications and resources: This is one of the primary use-cases for IAP. IAP helps enforce access control policies by verifying the identity of users accessing applications and resources and ensuring that they have the necessary permissions to do so. Therefore, IAP is a suitable solution for this use-case.

B. While working with signed headers to secure the app: Signed headers are a mechanism for verifying the authenticity of requests sent to an application. While IAP does support the use of signed headers, it is not the primary use-case for IAP. Other solutions such as Cloud Armor can be used for this purpose. Therefore, IAP may not be the most suitable solution for this use-case.

C. When setting up group-based application access: Group-based application access is another common use-case for IAP. IAP can be used to enforce access policies based on the user's group membership, making it easier to manage access at scale. Therefore, IAP is a suitable solution for this use-case.

D. Providing richer access controls to protect access to secure systems by using an end-user request and ensuring each request is authenticated and authorized: This use-case is similar to the first use-case, and IAP can provide the necessary access controls to protect secure systems. Therefore, IAP is a suitable solution for this use-case.

In conclusion, based on the above analysis, the use-case where IAP may not be the most suitable solution is when working with signed headers to secure an application. For all other use-cases, including enforcing access control policies, group-based application access, and providing richer access controls, IAP can be a suitable solution.