Control Self-Assessment (CSA) for Large Organizations | Time and Cost Efficiency

Most Time and Cost Efficient Control Self-Assessment (CSA) for Large Organizations

Prev Question Next Question

Question

Which of the following would be MOST time and cost efficient when performing a control self-assessment (CSA) for an organization with a large number of widely dispersed employees?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

C.

When performing a control self-assessment (CSA) for an organization with a large number of widely dispersed employees, the MOST time and cost-efficient approach would be to use a survey questionnaire.

A survey questionnaire is a standardized set of questions that can be distributed to a large number of employees simultaneously, regardless of their location. This approach allows for data collection from a diverse group of employees with different experiences and perspectives. It also enables a more objective and consistent assessment of the control environment, as each respondent will provide answers based on the same questions.

On the other hand, face-to-face interviews and facilitated workshops require more time and resources to organize and conduct. Face-to-face interviews may also be limited by geographic and scheduling constraints, whereas facilitated workshops require travel and accommodations, as well as the costs associated with hiring a facilitator.

Top-down and bottom-up analysis is a useful approach when performing a CSA, but it is not the most time and cost-efficient for an organization with a large number of widely dispersed employees. This approach involves reviewing the control environment from both a high-level and detailed perspective, which can be time-consuming and may require in-person meetings.

In summary, when performing a CSA for an organization with a large number of widely dispersed employees, a survey questionnaire would be the most time and cost-efficient approach. It enables data collection from a diverse group of employees with different experiences and perspectives, provides a more objective and consistent assessment of the control environment, and avoids the time and cost associated with face-to-face interviews and facilitated workshops.