What should an IS auditor do when informed that some recommendations cannot be implemented due to financial constraints?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A.
When an IS auditor is informed that some of their recommendations cannot be implemented due to financial constraints, there are several actions they can take.
Option A, documenting management's response in the working papers, is a good course of action. This helps to ensure that there is a clear record of the communication and can also help to demonstrate due diligence on the part of the IS auditor.
Option B, insisting that the recommendations be implemented, is not always feasible, as financial constraints may prevent the organization from being able to fully implement the recommendations. Additionally, insisting that the recommendations be implemented could strain the relationship between the auditor and the organization.
Option C, agreeing to waive the recommendations, is not recommended as it could compromise the effectiveness of the audit and the auditor's professional judgment.
Option D, suggesting management identify cost-effective alternatives, is a good course of action. This demonstrates that the auditor is committed to helping the organization improve its security posture, while also being mindful of financial constraints. This could include suggesting alternative solutions or identifying areas where the organization could prioritize spending to address the most critical risks. Ultimately, it is up to the organization to decide whether or not to implement the auditor's recommendations, but the auditor can still provide valuable guidance and suggestions.