How do traditional campus device management and Cisco DNA Center device management differ in regards to deployment?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
Traditional campus device management and Cisco DNA Center device management differ significantly in regards to deployment. Let's discuss each answer option in detail:
A. Traditional campus device management allows a network to scale more quickly than with Cisco DNA Center device management.
Traditional campus device management typically involves manual configuration of network devices, such as switches and routers. This approach can be time-consuming and prone to errors, particularly as the network grows in size and complexity. It may require hiring additional IT staff to manage the network, which can slow down the scaling process. In contrast, Cisco DNA Center device management automates many of these processes and provides a centralized platform for managing network devices. This can make it easier and faster to scale the network as needed, without requiring additional staff.
B. Cisco DNA Center device management can deploy a network more quickly than traditional campus device management.
As mentioned above, Cisco DNA Center device management automates many of the processes involved in configuring and managing network devices. This can significantly reduce the time required to deploy a new network or make changes to an existing one. Additionally, Cisco DNA Center provides a single, unified interface for managing the network, which can streamline the deployment process.
C. Cisco DNA Center device management can be implemented at a lower cost than most traditional campus device management options.
Implementing traditional campus device management typically requires purchasing and configuring a range of network devices, as well as hiring IT staff to manage the network. This can be expensive, particularly for larger networks. In contrast, Cisco DNA Center device management can be implemented on existing hardware, reducing the need for additional purchases. Additionally, the automation provided by Cisco DNA Center can reduce the need for additional staff, further reducing costs.
D. Traditional campus device management schemes can typically deploy patches and updates more quickly than Cisco DNA Center device management.
Traditional campus device management typically involves manually configuring and updating network devices, which can be time-consuming. However, it does provide more granular control over the update process, which can allow for faster deployment of patches and updates. In contrast, Cisco DNA Center device management automates many of these processes, which can take longer to deploy patches and updates. However, this automation can also reduce the risk of errors and ensure a more consistent deployment process.
In summary, Cisco DNA Center device management offers several advantages over traditional campus device management in regards to deployment. It can be faster to deploy and require less staff, and it can also be implemented at a lower cost. However, traditional campus device management may offer more granular control over certain processes, such as deploying patches and updates.