Question 38 of 92 from exam 300-410-ENARSI: Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services

Question 38 of 92 from exam 300-410-ENARSI: Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services

Prev Question Next Question

Question

192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.0/24 D SanFrancisco OSPF — Area 100 172.1.11.0/24 100 Mbps (2) 172.1.12.0/24 172.1.13.0/24 D Dallas 192.168.5.0/24 192.168.6.0/24 D> Boston 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.4.0/24
Show IP Route — San Francisco Router Gateway of last resort is not set 172.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks 172.1.11.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 172.1.11.1/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 172.1.12.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 172.1.12.1/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 172.1.13.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.11.2, 00:02:34, EthernetO/O 192.168.1.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, LoopbackO L_ 192.168.1.1/32 is directly connected, LoopbackO 192.168.2.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C — 192.168.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1 L_ 192.168.2.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback1. © — 192.168.3.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.11.2, 00:00: O — 192.168.4.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.11.2, 00 O — 192.168.5.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.12.3, 00:00: O — 192.168.6.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.12.3, 00:0 Show IP Route — Boston Gateway of last resort is not set 172.1.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 5 subnets, 2 masks 172.1.11.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.13.2, 00:04:44, EthernetO/1 [110/11] via 172.1.12.1, 00:04:44, Ethernet0/0 172.1.12.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 172.1.12.3/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 172.1,13.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 172.1.13.3/32 is directly connected, Ethernet0/O 192.168.1.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.12.1, 00:04:44, Ethernet0/O 192.168.2.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.12.1, 00:04:44, Ethernet0/O 192.168.3.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.13.2, 00:04:44, Ethernet0/1 192.168.4.0/24 [110/11] via 172.1.13.2, 00:04:44, EthernetO/1 192.168.5.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks 192.168.5.0/24 is directly connected, LoopbackO L_ 192.168.5.1/32 is directly connected, LoopbackO 192.168.6.0/24 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks C — 192.168.6.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1 L_ 192.168.6.1/32 is directly connected, Loopback

Refer to the exhibits.

SanFrancisco and Boston routers are choosing slower links to reach each other despite the direct links being up.

Which configuration fixes the issue?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

D.

Prev Question Next Question