Question 5 of 24 from exam 300-510-SPRI: Implementing Cisco Service Provider Advanced Routing Solutions

Question 5 of 24 from exam 300-510-SPRI: Implementing Cisco Service Provider Advanced Routing Solutions

Prev Question Next Question

Question

RP/O/0/CPUO:XR3#show bgp 10.11.11.0 Thu Jun 20 20:44:15.749 UTC BGP routing table entry for 10.11.11.0/24 Versions: Process bRIB/RIB— SendTbiVer Speaker 9 9 Paths: (2 available, best #2) Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer): 04 Path #1: Received by speaker 0 Not advertised to any peer 1 10.0.0.9 from 10.0.0.9 (192.168.0.1) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 0 Origin-AS validity: not-found Path #2: Received by speaker 0 Advertised to update-groups (with more than one peer): 04 1 10.0.0.13 from 10.0.0.13 (192.168.0.2) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 651, valid, external, best, group-best Received Path ID 0, Local Path ID 0, version 9

Refer to the exhibit.

A network operator is getting the route for 10.11.11 0/24 from two upstream providers on #XR3

The network operator must configure #XR3 to force the 10.11.11.0/24 prefix to route via next hop of 10.0.0.9 as primary when available.

Which of these can the operator use the routing policy language for, to enforce this traffic forwarding path?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

C.

Prev Question Next Question