The MOST likely reason to use qualitative security risk assessments instead of quantitative methods is when:
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A.
Qualitative and quantitative risk assessments are two methods used to assess the potential risks to an organization. Quantitative risk assessments use numerical values to assess the likelihood and impact of risks, while qualitative risk assessments use descriptive words or categories to assess risks.
The MOST likely reason to use qualitative security risk assessments instead of quantitative methods is when:
Option A: An organization provides services instead of hard goods. This answer is not relevant to the choice of using qualitative risk assessments over quantitative ones. The nature of an organization's goods or services does not determine the method of risk assessment.
Option B: A security program requires independent expression of risks. This answer is a possible reason to use qualitative risk assessments. Qualitative risk assessments can allow for greater independent expression of risks, as they are not as constrained by numerical data.
Option C: Available data is too subjective. This answer is also a possible reason to use qualitative risk assessments. If the available data on risks is too subjective or lacks quantitative data, a qualitative risk assessment may be more appropriate.
Option D: A mature security program is in place. This answer is not relevant to the choice of using qualitative risk assessments over quantitative ones. The maturity of a security program does not determine the method of risk assessment.
In summary, the most likely reason to use qualitative security risk assessments instead of quantitative methods is when the available data is too subjective or when a security program requires independent expression of risks.