A company engaged a third-party audit firm to provide regular financial oversight for regulatory compliance and requested a project manager to work with the firm.
The PMO declines to assign a project manager and refers to another department within the company.
Which of the following is MOST likely the reason for this?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.D.
Based on the scenario provided, the PMO has declined to assign a project manager to work with the third-party audit firm that has been engaged by the company for providing regular financial oversight for regulatory compliance. This suggests that there is some underlying reason for this decision. Let's examine each of the answer choices to determine the most likely reason for the PMO's decision:
A. There are not enough project managers available for additional work This answer choice suggests that the PMO may have declined to assign a project manager due to a shortage of available resources. While this could be a possible reason, it does not necessarily explain why the PMO would refer the company to another department within the organization.
B. The work does not align with the strategic objectives of the organization This answer choice suggests that the PMO may have declined to assign a project manager because the work does not align with the strategic objectives of the organization. While this could be a possible reason, it seems unlikely given that the company has engaged a third-party audit firm for financial oversight, which suggests that regulatory compliance is an important objective for the organization.
C. This is ongoing work the vendor has been hired to perform This answer choice suggests that the work that the third-party audit firm has been engaged to perform is ongoing and therefore, the PMO has declined to assign a project manager. This explanation seems plausible as ongoing work may not require the involvement of a project manager.
D. The third party has a reputation for expertise in this area. This answer choice suggests that the third-party audit firm has a reputation for expertise in financial oversight and regulatory compliance. If this is the case, then it is possible that the PMO has deferred to the expertise of the third-party audit firm and determined that their involvement is sufficient.
Based on the scenario provided, answer choice C seems to be the most likely reason for the PMO's decision to refer the company to another department within the organization. However, it is important to note that without additional information, it is difficult to determine the exact reason for the PMO's decision.