Compliance Officer's Response to Law Enforcement Agencies' Request for Customer Information

Best Practices for Responding to Law Enforcement Agencies' Requests

Prev Question Next Question

Question

How should a compliance officer respond to law enforcement agencies' request for information on a customer undergoing an investigation?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

B

https://www.acams.org/en/resources/aml-glossary-of-terms

When a compliance officer receives a request for information from a law enforcement agency regarding a customer undergoing an investigation, it is critical that they handle the request in a manner that ensures compliance with all relevant laws and regulations, while also protecting the institution's reputation and relationship with the customer. Here are some possible steps a compliance officer could take:

A. Collaborate with the financial institution's designated department to determine the appropriate course of action to comply with the request.

This is the correct response. Compliance officers should work closely with the institution's designated department (e.g., legal department, AML department) to determine the appropriate course of action to comply with the request. This could involve reviewing the request for completeness, authenticity, and legal sufficiency; identifying any applicable laws, regulations, or contractual obligations that may limit or prohibit disclosure; and evaluating the potential impact of the disclosure on the institution's reputation, customer relationships, and legal exposure. In some cases, it may be necessary to seek legal advice or guidance from external counsel.

B. Gather all requested documentation and send via secure email to the requesting authority.

This option is not advisable without proper consultation and collaboration with the institution's designated department. It may not comply with applicable laws, regulations, or contractual obligations, and it could potentially compromise the security and confidentiality of the information being shared. Moreover, it may not take into account the potential impact on the institution's reputation or customer relationships.

C. Share details of the investigation with respective colleagues who deal with this customer type on a daily basis.

This option is not advisable, as it could potentially compromise the confidentiality of the investigation and violate applicable laws, regulations, or contractual obligations. Compliance officers should only share information with colleagues on a need-to-know basis, and only after appropriate authorization and safeguards are in place.

D. Freeze account assets and advise the customer that assets will not be released until the investigation has been completed.

This option is not advisable without proper consultation and collaboration with the institution's designated department. Freezing account assets may be necessary in some cases to prevent further criminal activity or money laundering, but it should only be done in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, or contractual obligations, and after appropriate authorization and safeguards are in place. Moreover, freezing assets without proper justification or legal authority could potentially expose the institution to legal or reputational risk, and harm its relationship with the customer.

In summary, the compliance officer should collaborate with the institution's designated department to determine the appropriate course of action to comply with the request from law enforcement agencies. They should ensure that they comply with all relevant laws and regulations, protect the institution's reputation and relationship with the customer, and maintain the confidentiality and security of the information being shared.