A security analyst gathered forensics from a recent intrusion in preparation for legal proceedings.
The analyst used EnCase to gather the digital forensics, cloned the hard drive, and took the hard drive home for further analysis.
Which of the following did the security analyst violate?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
The security analyst violated the Chain of Custody by taking the hard drive home for further analysis.
The Chain of Custody is a critical component of digital forensics that documents the movement of evidence from the time it is collected to the time it is presented in court. It is essential to maintain the integrity of the evidence and ensure that it is not tampered with or altered in any way.
In this scenario, the security analyst should have followed proper procedures for maintaining the Chain of Custody. They should have documented the collection of the hard drive, marked it with a unique identifier, and stored it in a secure location. The hard drive should have been transferred to a secure location, such as a forensics lab, and analyzed using forensically sound methods to ensure that the data is not altered in any way.
By taking the hard drive home for further analysis, the security analyst violated the Chain of Custody. They could have potentially altered the data on the hard drive, making it inadmissible in court.
In conclusion, the security analyst should have followed proper procedures for maintaining the Chain of Custody to ensure the integrity of the digital evidence collected during the investigation.