"SPF Record Update for Preventing Email Spam and Blocking"

"Best SPF Record Update to Prevent Email Spam and Blocking"

Question

A company's marketing emails are either being found in a spam folder or not being delivered at all.

The security analyst investigates the issue and discovers the emails in question are being sent on behalf of the company by a third party, mail.marketing.com.

Below is the existing SPF record: v=spf1 a mx -all Which of the following updates to the SPF record will work BEST to prevent the emails from being marked as spam or blocked?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

D.

The Sender Policy Framework (SPF) is a method used to prevent email spoofing by verifying that an email message is sent from an authorized IP address. An SPF record is a type of Domain Name System (DNS) record that specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of a domain.

In this scenario, the company's marketing emails are being marked as spam or blocked because they are being sent on behalf of the company by a third party, mail.marketing.com, and the existing SPF record does not include this third-party mail server as an authorized sender. To resolve this issue, the SPF record needs to be updated.

Let's examine each answer choice in turn:

A. v=spf1 a mx redirect:mail.marketing.com ?all

This answer choice uses the "redirect" mechanism to specify that the SPF record for the company's domain should be retrieved from mail.marketing.com. The "?all" qualifier indicates that the default result for email messages that do not pass SPF validation should be "neutral". However, this approach is not recommended because it allows any sender to pass SPF validation, which defeats the purpose of SPF.

B. v=spf1 a mx include:mail.marketing.com -all

This answer choice uses the "include" mechanism to specify that the SPF record for the company's domain should include the SPF record for mail.marketing.com. The "-all" qualifier indicates that email messages that do not pass SPF validation should be rejected. This is a better approach than Answer A because it restricts the authorized senders to those specified in the SPF record and rejects email messages that do not pass SPF validation.

C. v=spf1 a mx +all

This answer choice uses the "+all" qualifier to indicate that all email messages should be accepted regardless of SPF validation results. This is not recommended because it allows any sender to pass SPF validation, which defeats the purpose of SPF.

D. v=spf1 a mx include:mail.marketing.com ~all

This answer choice is similar to Answer B, but uses the "~all" qualifier instead of "-all". The "~all" qualifier indicates that email messages that do not pass SPF validation should be marked as "soft fail". This means that the email message may still be delivered, but it will be marked as potentially suspicious. This approach is not as strict as Answer B, but it provides more flexibility in case some authorized senders are not included in the SPF record.

Therefore, the best answer to prevent the marketing emails from being marked as spam or blocked is B. v=spf1 a mx include:mail.marketing.com -all