A large software company wants to move its source control and deployment pipelines into a cloud-computing environment.
Due to the nature of the business, management determines the recovery time objective needs to be within one hour.
Which of the following strategies would put the company in the BEST position to achieve the desired recovery time?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A.
To achieve a recovery time objective of one hour, the software company needs to ensure that its source control and deployment pipelines are highly available and can recover quickly in the event of a failure. The following options are available:
A. Establish an alternate site with active replication to other regions: This strategy involves setting up an alternate site in a different geographical region that is actively replicated with the primary site. This approach provides a high level of redundancy and ensures that the system can recover quickly in the event of a failure. However, it can be costly and requires a lot of resources to set up and maintain.
B. Configure a duplicate environment in the same region and load balance between both instances: This strategy involves setting up a duplicate environment in the same region and using load balancing to distribute traffic between the two instances. This approach provides a high level of availability and can recover quickly in the event of a failure. However, it may not provide sufficient redundancy in the event of a regional failure.
C. Set up every cloud component with duplicated copies and auto-scaling turned on: This strategy involves setting up duplicated copies of every cloud component and enabling auto-scaling to ensure that the system can handle increased traffic. This approach provides a high level of availability and can recover quickly in the event of a failure. However, it can be costly and complex to set up and maintain.
D. Create a duplicate copy on premises that can be used for failover in a disaster situation: This strategy involves setting up a duplicate copy of the system on premises that can be used for failover in the event of a disaster. This approach provides a high level of redundancy and ensures that the system can recover quickly in the event of a failure. However, it may not be as flexible or scalable as cloud-based solutions.
Based on the recovery time objective of one hour, option A would put the company in the BEST position to achieve the desired recovery time. This approach provides a high level of redundancy and can recover quickly in the event of a failure, while also providing geographic diversity to ensure that the system can recover from regional failures. However, the cost and complexity of setting up and maintaining an alternate site need to be considered.