Which of the following configuration management tools is considered agentless?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.C.
https://www.intigua.com/blog/puppet-vs.-chef-vs.-ansible-vs.-saltstackThe correct answer is C. Ansible.
Configuration management tools are used to automate the configuration of servers, applications, and other infrastructure components. These tools allow administrators to manage large, complex environments with consistency, predictability, and efficiency.
Agent-based configuration management tools require software agents to be installed on the managed servers or devices. These agents are responsible for reporting their current state and executing configuration changes. Examples of agent-based tools include Puppet, Salt, and Chef.
In contrast, agentless configuration management tools do not require any software agents to be installed on the managed servers or devices. Instead, these tools use standard protocols such as SSH (Secure Shell) or WinRM (Windows Remote Management) to communicate with the remote systems and execute commands. Examples of agentless tools include Ansible and Rudder.
Ansible is a popular open-source configuration management tool that uses an agentless architecture. Ansible uses YAML-based playbooks to describe the desired state of the systems it manages. These playbooks can be used to perform a wide range of configuration tasks, such as installing software, configuring files, and managing users and groups. Ansible can be used to manage Linux, Unix, and Windows systems, as well as cloud-based environments such as Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure.
In summary, Ansible is considered an agentless configuration management tool because it does not require any software agents to be installed on the managed systems. This makes it easier to deploy and manage, and also reduces the overhead and complexity of the managed systems.