Which of the following precautions MINIMIZES the risk from network attacks directed at multifunction printers, as well as the impact on functionality at the same time?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A.
Multifunction printers (MFPs) are commonly used in office environments for printing, scanning, copying, and faxing. However, MFPs are also vulnerable to network attacks, which can result in data breaches, network intrusions, and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. To minimize the risk from network attacks directed at multifunction printers, as well as the impact on functionality, various precautions can be taken.
A. Isolating the systems using VLANs VLANs (Virtual Local Area Networks) are used to logically separate devices into different network segments, thereby limiting communication between them. Isolating MFPs using VLANs is a good security measure as it can prevent attackers from accessing sensitive data and systems on the network. However, VLANs can be complex to configure, and there may be compatibility issues with older MFPs. Also, VLANs do not protect against attacks originating from within the same VLAN or against physical attacks.
B. Installing a software-based IPS on all devices An Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) is a network security device that monitors network traffic for malicious activity and takes action to prevent it. Installing a software-based IPS on all devices, including MFPs, can help protect against network attacks by detecting and blocking suspicious traffic. However, installing software-based IPS on MFPs can negatively impact performance, as it can cause delays in printing and scanning.
C. Enabling full disk encryption Full disk encryption (FDE) is a technique used to encrypt all data on a hard drive or storage device. Enabling FDE on MFPs can prevent unauthorized access to stored data if the MFPs are lost or stolen. However, FDE does not protect against network attacks and may cause performance issues during printing and scanning.
D. Implementing a unique user PIN access functions. Implementing a unique user PIN access function on MFPs can help prevent unauthorized access to the device and its functions. A unique user PIN can also track usage and help identify any suspicious activity. This is a good security measure as it provides a layer of protection without negatively impacting functionality. However, users must be diligent in keeping their PINs secure and not sharing them with others.
In conclusion, among the given options, implementing a unique user PIN access function (D) minimizes the risk from network attacks directed at multifunction printers, as well as the impact on functionality, without negatively impacting performance.