Resolve AVD Performance Issues with FSLogix and Transactional Optimized Storage
Question
You are having a small pilot group of AVD using FSLogix.
The company cut the expenses for the pilot by utilizing Transactional Optimized storage for the Azure file share.
Users find that applications are slow and sometimes there are errors.
Which of the following steps would you take to resolve the issue?
Answers
Explanations
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.Correct Answer: B
For a Transaction File share, the maximum IOPS is 1000
Enabling large file shares on the storage account will increase it to 10,000 IOPS.This change won't affect the environment.
Option A is incorrect.
You can't upgrade a storage account to Azure NetApp Files.
Option B is correct.
Enabling large file shares on the storage account is the recommended solution to resolve the identified issue.
Option C is incorrect.
Profiles should be moved to a Premium storage account only if the pilot moves to production.
Option D is incorrect.
You can't upgrade a storage account to Azure premium file share.
To know more about Azure Files scalability and performance targets, please visit the below-given link:
In this scenario, the users of the small pilot group of AVD using FSLogix are experiencing slow application performance and errors. The company has reduced expenses by utilizing Transactional Optimized storage for the Azure file share. To resolve the issue, the following steps could be taken:
A. Upgrade the storage account to Azure NetApp files: Azure NetApp Files is a high-performance file storage service that is suitable for demanding enterprise workloads. If the performance issue is related to the storage performance, upgrading to Azure NetApp Files can improve the performance. However, this is an expensive option, and it may not be necessary for a small pilot group.
B. Enable large file shares on the storage account: If the slow application performance is related to the size of the files being accessed, enabling large file shares on the storage account can improve performance. However, this may not be a suitable option if the issue is related to storage performance.
C. Create a new premium file share, use RoboCopy to migrate existing profiles: This option involves creating a new premium file share and using RoboCopy to migrate existing profiles. This can improve performance as premium file shares offer higher performance than standard file shares. However, this option may require significant time and effort to implement.
D. Upgrade the storage account to Azure Premium file share: Upgrading the storage account to Azure Premium file share can provide better performance than Transactional Optimized storage. This can be a more cost-effective solution than upgrading to Azure NetApp files, and it can improve the performance for the pilot group. This option is suitable if the slow application performance is related to storage performance.
Overall, the best option would be to upgrade the storage account to Azure Premium file share (Option D) as it can provide better performance and is a more cost-effective solution than upgrading to Azure NetApp files. Additionally, it can directly address the issue related to the storage performance without requiring significant time and effort to implement like Option C.
