Which configuration causes RIP-learned routes to be advertised to other RIP neighbors?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B
The correct answer is B:
Option A, "set protocol rip no-passive" is not a valid configuration statement.
Option C, "set protocols rip advertise in-out" enables RIP to advertise all RIP-learned routes to other RIP neighbors, but this option can cause unnecessary network traffic and is not recommended in most scenarios.
Option D, "top edit policy-options policy-statement demo set term 1 from active routes set term 1 then accept" configures a policy that exports all active routes, which includes all routes learned through all protocols, not just RIP.
Option B, "top edit policy-options policy-statement demo set term 1 from protocol rip set term 1 then accept top set protocols rip group internal export demo", configures a policy statement that matches routes learned through the RIP protocol and then exports them to other RIP neighbors. The "set term 1 from protocol rip" statement matches RIP-learned routes, and the "set term 1 then accept" statement exports them. The "set protocols rip group internal export demo" statement then applies this policy to the RIP routing process.
Therefore, Option B is the correct answer.