Tuning Cluster Performance for Spark Workload in HDInsight

Best Practices for Optimizing Spark Clusters

Question

You are designing a data solution for Spark workload in HDInsight.

Which of the options are correct in case of tuning the cluster for performance? (Multiple choice)

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

Correct Answers: A and C.

For the HDInsight cluster, there are three layers that can be tuned to increase the containers and use all the available throughput.

They are the Physical Layer, YARN layer, and Workload Layer.

At Physical Layer, run clusters with larger-sized VMs; a larger cluster will have more space to run YARN containers.

At the YARN layer, each YARN container size should be smaller; we have more space to create more YARN containers.

PHYSICAL LAYER

Image Source: Microsoft.

EAH] EE

VM with 4 Larger VM with One VM with — Two VMs with
containers 8 containers 4containers 8 containers

YARN LAYER.

Image Source: Microsoft.

4 containers 8 smaller

containers

Options A and C correct: In the physical layer, VM size should be larger to accommodate more number of YARNS, while at YARN layer the yarn container size should be less to utilize the maximum resources at the physical Layer.

Options B and D are incorrect: This is exactly opposite to what is expected.

So, it not only helps in tuning but also affects adversely.

To know more, please refer to the docs below:

When designing a data solution for Spark workload in HDInsight, it is important to consider cluster tuning for optimal performance. The following options are available for cluster tuning:

A. At Physical Layer, run a cluster with larger-sized VMs: Larger-sized VMs will provide more processing power, memory, and storage, allowing for increased processing capacity and better performance. This can be a good option if the workload requires a lot of resources.

B. At Physical Layer, run a cluster with smaller-sized VMs: Smaller-sized VMs may not have as much processing power, memory, or storage, which could lead to slower processing times and lower performance. However, if the workload is small and does not require many resources, this could be a cost-effective option.

C. Use smaller YARN containers: Smaller YARN containers will have less memory and fewer resources, which may result in faster processing times and better performance. This is a good option if the workload can be broken down into smaller tasks that can be processed in parallel.

D. Use Bigger YARN containers: Larger YARN containers will have more memory and more resources, which could lead to slower processing times and lower performance. However, if the workload requires a lot of resources and cannot be broken down into smaller tasks, this could be a good option.

In summary, the best option for cluster tuning will depend on the specific requirements of the Spark workload. If the workload requires a lot of resources, running a cluster with larger-sized VMs or using bigger YARN containers could be beneficial. If the workload can be broken down into smaller tasks, using smaller YARN containers could lead to better performance.