The Main Impact of Lacking Senior Management Involvement in Developing an Information Security Governance Framework

C.

When developing an information security governance framework, senior management involvement is crucial. If senior management lacks involvement, the main impact will be that information security governance will not be effective, and this will manifest in several ways:

A. Accountability for risk treatment is not clearly defined: Senior management involvement is required to ensure that the accountability for risk treatment is clearly defined. This is important because without clear accountability, it is difficult to know who is responsible for addressing a specific risk or issue.

B. Information security responsibilities are not communicated effectively: Senior management involvement is also critical in communicating information security responsibilities effectively. Without senior management involvement, it is unlikely that employees will be aware of their responsibilities, and this can lead to increased risk and vulnerability.

C. Resource requirements are not adequately considered: Senior management involvement is needed to ensure that resource requirements are adequately considered. Information security governance requires resources, such as time, personnel, and funding. Without senior management involvement, these requirements may not be adequately considered, leading to inadequate resources being allocated, and information security being compromised.

D. Information security plans do not support business requirements: Finally, senior management involvement is necessary to ensure that information security plans support business requirements. Information security should be aligned with business goals and objectives, and without senior management involvement, information security plans may not adequately support these requirements.

In summary, the main impact of lacking senior management involvement when developing an information security governance framework is that information security will not be effective, and this will manifest in several ways, including unclear accountability for risk treatment, ineffective communication of information security responsibilities, inadequate consideration of resource requirements, and information security plans that do not support business requirements.