Which configuration correctly enables an IRB interface on an MX Series device?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.D
The following configuration (show above in xml format) is the correct answer as it correctly includes the routing-interface irb: set bridge-domains vlan-222 vlan-id 222 set bridge-domains vlan-222 routing-interface irb.0
An Integrated Routing and Bridging (IRB) interface is a logical interface that enables communication between Layer 2 bridging domains and Layer 3 IP routing interfaces on an MX Series device.
The correct configuration to enable an IRB interface on an MX Series device is option D:
kotlin[edit] user@switch# show bridge-domains vlan-222 vlan-id 222; routing-interface irb.0; This configuration statement defines the VLAN with ID 222 as a Layer 2 bridging domain and associates it with the Layer 3 IP routing interface irb.0. This enables communication between the VLAN and the IP routing table, allowing the device to route traffic to and from the VLAN.
Option A, which specifies layer3-interface irb.0 within the bridge-domain configuration, is incorrect because it does not explicitly define the bridging domain as a Layer 2 domain. It only associates the interface with the IRB interface, but does not specify that it should be treated as a bridging domain.
Option B, which specifies layer3-interface lt.0 within the bridge-domain configuration, is also incorrect because it associates the VLAN with a Layer 3 logical tunnel (lt.0) rather than an IRB interface.
Option C, which specifies routing-interface lt.0 within the bridge-domain configuration, is incorrect because it also associates the VLAN with a Layer 3 logical tunnel rather than an IRB interface.
Therefore, the correct configuration statement to enable an IRB interface on an MX Series device is:
kotlin[edit] user@switch# show bridge-domains vlan-222 vlan-id 222; routing-interface irb.0;