An IS audit manager was temporarily tasked with supervising a project manager assigned to the organization's payroll application upgrade.
Upon returning to the audit department, the audit manager has been asked to perform an audit to validate the implementation of the payroll application.
The audit manager is the only one in the audit department with IT project management experience.
What is the BEST course of action?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
The best course of action in this scenario is D. Manage the audit since there is no one else with the appropriate experience.
The reason behind this is that the audit manager has the necessary experience in IT project management, which is crucial for understanding and assessing the implementation of the payroll application upgrade. This experience will enable the audit manager to effectively evaluate the project management processes, identify risks, and assess the project's progress and status.
Option A is not the best course of action because transferring the assignment to a different audit manager without the necessary experience may result in the project's inadequate review and management.
Option B is also not the best course of action as having a senior IS auditor manage the project, while the audit manager performs the final review, may result in duplication of efforts and potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, the senior auditor may not have the necessary IT project management experience.
Option C may not be the best course of action as outsourcing the audit to independent and qualified resources may not be cost-effective, and the audit manager's experience and expertise may be valuable in assessing the implementation of the payroll application upgrade.
In summary, the audit manager should manage the audit since there is no one else with the appropriate experience to ensure an effective review and management of the payroll application upgrade project.