Assessing the Results of a Penetration Test

B.

When assessing the results of a recent penetration test to identify potential vulnerabilities, an IS auditor should review the parameters of the test first (Option B).

The parameters of the test should be the first thing to review because they determine the scope and methodology used in the penetration testing. This information will provide insight into the test's limitations and ensure that the test is comprehensive and covers all relevant areas of the system. It will also help the auditor understand the testing process and its effectiveness in identifying potential vulnerabilities.

After reviewing the test parameters, the auditor can review the number of critical issues found (Option C). This information will help the auditor understand the severity of the vulnerabilities identified and prioritize the remediation efforts.

The skill level of the network support staff (Option A) is not directly related to the results of the penetration test. However, the auditor should review the qualifications and expertise of the staff responsible for managing and securing the system.

The incident response process (Option D) is important, but it is not directly related to the results of the penetration test. The incident response process outlines the steps that should be taken in the event of a security incident. It is important to review the incident response process to ensure that it is comprehensive and effective in managing security incidents.

In summary, an IS auditor should review the parameters of the test first when assessing the results of a recent penetration test to identify potential vulnerabilities. Reviewing the parameters will help the auditor understand the scope and methodology of the test. After reviewing the parameters, the auditor can then review the number of critical issues found to understand the severity of the vulnerabilities identified.