Assessing Implementation against Industry-Recognized IT Framework

A.

The best option among the given choices to assess the implementation of an industry-recognized IT framework is industry benchmarking (Option C).

Industry benchmarking involves comparing an organization's performance against industry standards and best practices. In this case, an IS auditor can compare the organization's implementation of the IT framework against the industry-standard implementation of the same framework to identify any gaps or deficiencies.

The other options, capability maturity model (Option A), key risk indicators (Option B), and balanced scorecard (Option D), are useful tools in their own right but may not be the most appropriate for assessing the implementation of an IT framework.

Capability maturity model (CMM) is a framework that helps organizations improve their software development processes. It is not directly related to IT governance or the implementation of an IT framework.

Key risk indicators (KRIs) are used to monitor and measure an organization's exposure to risk. While KRIs may be helpful in assessing the risks associated with the implementation of an IT framework, they are not focused on evaluating the overall effectiveness of IT governance.

Balanced scorecard is a performance management tool that is used to measure an organization's progress towards its strategic objectives. While a balanced scorecard may be useful in assessing the effectiveness of IT governance, it may not provide the specific details necessary to assess the implementation of an IT framework.