-- Exhibit --
[edit policy-options]
user@router# show
policy-statementpolicyABC {
term A {
from {
protocol rip;
route-filter 192.168.1.0/24 longer;
}
then accept;
}
}
[edit protocols ospf]
user@router# show
exportpolicyABC;
area 0.0.0.0 {
interface ge-0/0/0.0;
interface lo0.0;
}
-- Exhibit --
Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are true? (Choose two.)
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.AD
The exhibit shows part of a Junos configuration with a policy statement defined under policy-options and an OSPF protocol configuration under protocols ospf. Based on the provided configuration, let's analyze each statement.
A. The route 192.168.1.0/25 is accepted. The policy statement "policyABC" accepts any route that matches the condition specified in the term A. In this case, any RIP protocol route with a prefix length longer than /24 (192.168.1.0/24) will be accepted. However, 192.168.1.0/25 has a prefix length shorter than /24, so it will not be accepted. Therefore, this statement is False.
B. The route 192.168.2.0/24 is accepted. There is no mention of the route 192.168.2.0/24 in the configuration provided. Therefore, we cannot determine if this statement is True or False.
C. OSPF routes will be exported into RIP. There is no indication of an export policy under policy-options to export OSPF routes into RIP. The only reference to the policy statement "policyABC" is under the OSPF protocol configuration as an export policy. Hence, this statement is False.
D. RIP routes will be exported into OSPF. Under the OSPF protocol configuration, an export policy named "policyABC" is specified, indicating that routes that match the conditions in that policy statement will be exported into OSPF. Therefore, this statement is True.
Therefore, the correct statements are B and D.