A foreign politically exposed person (PEP) requests to add a beneficiary to a life insurance policy.
How should the request be processed to mitigate risk?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A
The request by a foreign politically exposed person (PEP) to add a beneficiary to a life insurance policy creates a potential risk for money laundering or terrorist financing. To mitigate this risk, the insurance provider should take certain measures to ensure that the transaction is legitimate and not being used to launder money or finance terrorism.
Option A, which suggests performing due diligence on the beneficiary, is a recommended measure to mitigate the risk. Due diligence includes verifying the identity of the beneficiary, understanding the relationship between the PEP and the beneficiary, and reviewing the beneficiary's source of funds and wealth. This can be done by conducting a risk-based assessment of the beneficiary, which may involve collecting personal and financial information, reviewing public records, and conducting enhanced due diligence measures, if necessary.
Option B, which suggests determining the source of wealth and source of funds, is also an important measure to mitigate the risk. This involves understanding the PEP's financial background and identifying the origin of the funds that will be used to pay the premiums for the insurance policy. If the source of funds is not clear, or if it raises suspicions of illicit activity, further investigation may be necessary.
Option C, which suggests declining the request if the beneficiary is a foreign PEP, is not necessarily the best course of action. While foreign PEPs are generally considered to be high-risk individuals, it may be possible to process the transaction if appropriate measures are taken to mitigate the risk. Declining the request outright without conducting any due diligence or risk assessment could potentially lead to reputational damage or legal liability.
Option D, which suggests declining the request to add a beneficiary due to increased risk, is also not necessarily the best course of action. While the transaction does present an increased risk, it may be possible to process the transaction if appropriate measures are taken to mitigate the risk. Simply declining the request without conducting any due diligence or risk assessment could potentially lead to reputational damage or legal liability.
In summary, to mitigate the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing associated with a foreign PEP's request to add a beneficiary to a life insurance policy, it is recommended that the insurance provider perform due diligence on the beneficiary, determine the source of wealth and source of funds, and conduct a risk-based assessment of the transaction. These measures will help ensure that the transaction is legitimate and that the insurance provider is not unwittingly facilitating illicit activity.