Note: The question is included in a number of questions that depicts the identical set-up. However, every question has a distinctive result. Establish if the solution satisfies the requirements.
Your company is planning to migrate all their virtual machines to an Azure pay-as-you-go subscription. The virtual machines are currently hosted on the Hyper-V hosts in a data center.
You are required make sure that the intended Azure solution uses the correct expenditure model.
Solution: You should recommend the use of the operational expenditure model.
Does the solution meet the goal?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B.A
The solution provided, which recommends the use of the operational expenditure (OpEx) model, does meet the goal of using the correct expenditure model for migrating virtual machines to an Azure pay-as-you-go subscription.
In the context of Azure, there are two primary expenditure models: capital expenditure (CapEx) and operational expenditure (OpEx).
Capital Expenditure (CapEx):
Operational Expenditure (OpEx):
In the given scenario, the company plans to migrate their virtual machines from Hyper-V hosts in a data center to an Azure pay-as-you-go subscription. Since the company wants to move away from hosting their virtual machines on-premises and instead utilize the Azure cloud, it aligns better with the OpEx model rather than CapEx.
By choosing the OpEx model, the company can benefit from the following advantages:
Cost Flexibility: The OpEx model allows the company to pay only for the resources they use, providing cost flexibility based on actual consumption.
Scalability: Azure offers the ability to easily scale resources up or down as needed, allowing the company to adapt to changing demands without upfront investments.
Elimination of On-Premises Infrastructure: By migrating to Azure, the company can avoid the upfront costs and ongoing maintenance expenses associated with hosting virtual machines in their own data center.
Reduced Management Overhead: With Azure, the company can offload the responsibility of managing the underlying infrastructure, including hardware maintenance and software updates, to Microsoft.
Therefore, the recommended use of the operational expenditure model aligns with the goal of migrating virtual machines to an Azure pay-as-you-go subscription, providing the company with cost flexibility, scalability, reduced management overhead, and eliminating the need for on-premises infrastructure. The solution meets the requirements, and the answer is A. Yes.
The solution provided of using the operational expenditure model for the intended Azure solution is a correct recommendation and meets the goal of using the correct expenditure model for the migration of virtual machines to an Azure pay-as-you-go subscription.
The operational expenditure (OpEx) model is a payment model that involves paying for services or resources on a periodic basis, typically on a monthly basis. This model is preferred for organizations that want to reduce the upfront costs of investments and want to pay only for what they use. This model is also beneficial for businesses that require flexibility to scale up or down resources as per their needs.
In the context of migrating virtual machines to Azure, using the OpEx model means that the company will pay only for the resources used on a monthly basis. This will help in reducing the upfront investment costs and providing flexibility to scale up or down resources as per their needs. Furthermore, the pay-as-you-go subscription in Azure allows customers to stop or start using services at any time without any penalties or termination fees.
Therefore, recommending the use of the operational expenditure model for the intended Azure solution aligns with the goal of using the correct expenditure model for migrating virtual machines to Azure. The correct answer to the question is A. Yes.