Cost-Effective Network Redesign for Latency-Sensitive Application

A small business developed an in-house application that is very sensitive to network latency when a communicating between servers.

Due to a lack of funds, the business had to build its own network for workstations and servers.

Now a network administrator must redesign the network due to performance issues with the application.

Which of the following would be the MOST cost effective for the administrator to recommend?

A.

Create Ethernet VLANs

B.

Disable autonegotiation on the servers

C.

Install 10Gb Ethernet NICs in the servers

D.

Install Fibre Channel for the server network.

C.

In this scenario, the small business developed an in-house application that is sensitive to network latency when communicating between servers. Due to a lack of funds, the business had to build its own network for workstations and servers. The network administrator must redesign the network due to performance issues with the application, while also keeping in mind cost-effectiveness.

The options given are:

A. Create Ethernet VLANs B. Disable autonegotiation on the servers C. Install 10Gb Ethernet NICs in the servers D. Install Fibre Channel for the server network

Out of the given options, the most cost-effective solution would be to install 10Gb Ethernet NICs in the servers (Option C). Here's why:

Option A, creating Ethernet VLANs, is a viable solution for network segmentation and traffic isolation. However, it may not necessarily address the issue of latency between servers, especially if the underlying infrastructure is not performing optimally.

Option B, disabling autonegotiation on the servers, is not a good solution as it can cause network instability and configuration errors. Additionally, it is unlikely to address the issue of latency between servers.

Option D, installing Fibre Channel for the server network, is a high-performance solution for storage area networks (SANs). However, it is expensive and may not necessarily address the issue of latency between servers, as it is primarily used for storage traffic.

Option C, installing 10Gb Ethernet NICs in the servers, is a cost-effective solution that can greatly improve network performance. By increasing the network speed, the latency between servers can be reduced, resulting in better application performance. While this option may require some upfront costs for purchasing the NICs, it is likely to provide the most noticeable performance improvement for the lowest cost.

In conclusion, out of the given options, installing 10Gb Ethernet NICs in the servers (Option C) would be the most cost-effective solution to address the network latency issue for the small business's in-house application.