You have an OSPF network. On certain applications and links, you need OSPF recovery to be faster than can be provided by OSPF timers. Which protocol would meet this requirement?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) accomplishes this task for a number of protocols, including OSPF.
The protocol that would meet the requirement of providing faster OSPF recovery than the standard OSPF timers is Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD). BFD is a protocol that detects faults in a forwarding path between two routers, and it can quickly notify OSPF when there is a problem.
OSPF is a protocol that enables routers to communicate and exchange routing information with one another. It is used in large networks and is designed to scale well, but it may take some time to detect and recover from a failure. This can be a problem for certain applications and links that require fast recovery times.
BFD can be used to provide fast detection and recovery times for OSPF. It works by periodically sending packets between two routers to detect faults in the forwarding path. If a fault is detected, OSPF can be notified immediately, allowing for faster recovery times.
The other options, OSPFv3, GRES, and NSR, do not directly provide faster OSPF recovery times. OSPFv3 is simply a newer version of OSPF that supports IPv6. GRES (Graceful Routing Engine Switchover) is a feature that allows for seamless switching between routing engines in Juniper Networks devices, but it does not directly affect OSPF recovery times. NSR (Nonstop Routing) is another Juniper feature that allows for the maintenance of routing information during certain types of device restarts, but it also does not directly affect OSPF recovery times.