Assessment Actions

Correct Answers: B, D and E

When you, as a Solution Architects, collect and review the requirements, you should always consider the feasibility of meeting the requirement.

The review can include the feasibility of the requirement for new or current functionality.

It would be best to verify that users are expecting or requiring the feature and that it will be used.

You need to confirm that implementation of the requirements would not violate rules, regulations, or laws.

If the requirements are in violation, you must remove them from the project scope.

Also, it is crucial to assess the technology limitations or performance expectations.

The performance requirements must be based on the target infrastructure or software defined for the project to run.

If the stakeholders' performance expectations are above the defined technology capabilities, you need to communicate with a customer and change or remove the requirement.

Option A is incorrect because the proof of concept is essential for the pre-sales stage and initial design stage, but it is not part of the requirements.

Option C is incorrect because the naming convention for the project is an essential tool for smooth solution implementation and maintenance.

But the convention is not a typical project requirement that needs to be assessed on feasibility.

For more information about the assessment of the feasibility of the requirements, please visit the below URL:

Sure, I'd be happy to explain the three actions that can help with assessing the feasibility of meeting the requirements for a Power Platform project.

1. Create a proof of concept (POC): A POC is a prototype that demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed solution. It provides stakeholders with a tangible example of what the final product might look like and how it might function. Creating a POC can help identify any technical or functional limitations that may need to be addressed, as well as any additional requirements that may need to be added.

2. Evaluate feature usability: Evaluating feature usability involves analyzing how easy or difficult it is for end-users to use the proposed solution. The Power Platform provides a wide range of features and capabilities, and it is important to ensure that they are all accessible and easy to use for the target audience. By evaluating feature usability, it is possible to identify any potential issues or limitations that may need to be addressed before the solution is deployed.

3. Verify compliance with rules and regulations: It is important to ensure that the proposed solution complies with any relevant rules, regulations, or industry standards. Depending on the nature of the project, this may include data protection regulations, industry-specific standards, or organizational policies. Verifying compliance with these requirements can help identify any potential risks or limitations that may need to be addressed before the solution is deployed.

It is worth noting that the other two options listed (agreeing on naming conventions for code and ensuring stakeholders' solution performance expectations are met) are also important considerations for any Power Platform project. However, they may not be as directly related to assessing the feasibility of meeting the requirements as the three options listed above.