Courtney is the project manager for her organization.
She is working with the project team to complete the qualitative risk analysis for her project.
During the analysis Courtney encourages the project team to begin the grouping of identified risks by common causes.
What is the primary advantage to group risks by common causes during qualitative risk analysis?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
By grouping the risks by categories the project team can develop effective risk responses.
Related risk events often have common causal factors that can be addressed with a single risk response.
During the qualitative risk analysis process, the project team identifies and assesses risks based on their likelihood and impact on the project objectives. Grouping risks by common causes can provide several advantages in the process.
The primary advantage of grouping risks by common causes is that it helps the project team to identify the areas of the project most laden with risks. By grouping risks that share common causes, the project team can more easily recognize the underlying issues that may be driving multiple risks. This can help them to focus their risk management efforts on those areas of the project that are most at risk, and develop more effective risk responses to address the common causes.
For example, if the project team identifies several risks related to a particular vendor's performance, they may group those risks together to identify the underlying cause(s) of the issues with the vendor. This could help them to address the root cause(s) of the vendor's poor performance, which may lead to a reduction in the number and severity of risks associated with that vendor.
Grouping risks by common causes can also assist in developing effective risk responses. By identifying the underlying causes of risks, the project team can more easily develop targeted and appropriate risk responses that address those causes. This can help to mitigate or avoid the risks altogether, rather than simply treating the symptoms of the risks.
In addition, grouping risks by common causes can save time by collecting related resources, such as project team members, to analyze the risk events. When risks are grouped by common causes, it can be easier to assign responsibilities and identify the stakeholders who are most affected by the risks. This can help to ensure that the right people are involved in the risk analysis and response planning process.
Finally, grouping risks by common causes can lead to the creation of risk categories unique to each project. By identifying the specific causes of risks in a particular project, the project team can develop a more nuanced understanding of the risks that are unique to that project. This can help them to develop more tailored risk management strategies that are better suited to the specific risks they face.
In summary, the primary advantage of grouping risks by common causes during qualitative risk analysis is that it helps the project team to identify the areas of the project most at risk, develop more effective risk responses, save time by collecting related resources, and create risk categories unique to each project.