Which type of sanctions are most likely to be used in order to avoid escalating violent conflicts and/or proliferation of weapons?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.D
https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:6431/UNSanctionsandPreventionConflict-Aug-2017.pdf(3)
In order to prevent the escalation of violent conflicts and the proliferation of weapons, governments and international bodies use a variety of sanctions. Sanctions are measures taken by governments or international bodies to restrict or prohibit certain activities with the aim of achieving a desired outcome, such as changing the behavior of a targeted entity.
Among the different types of sanctions, the most effective ones to avoid escalating violent conflicts and/or proliferation of weapons are arms and related materials embargo.
Arms embargo refers to the prohibition or restriction of the import, export, or transfer of weapons, military equipment, and related materials to a specific country or group. This type of sanction is intended to prevent the spread of weapons and military equipment to countries or groups that may use them to further violent conflicts, terrorism, or other forms of destabilization. An arms embargo can also help to promote peaceful negotiation and reduce the likelihood of escalation of violence.
On the other hand, financial prohibitions and asset freezes are also useful sanctions in targeting individuals and entities involved in violent conflicts, as they can restrict their ability to access financial resources. Export and import restrictions can also be used to prevent the proliferation of weapons, but they may not be as effective as arms embargo since they only limit the flow of specific goods, rather than preventing the transfer of weapons entirely.
In conclusion, while all of the listed sanctions can be useful tools in combating violent conflicts and the proliferation of weapons, arms and related materials embargo is the most effective type of sanction in achieving this goal.