Best Disk Types for a Low I/O File Server
Question
An administrator has been tasked with making recommendations for purchasing new disks for a low I/O file server.
Keeping in mind that budget and capacity are the primary concerns, which the following disk types should the administrator recommend?
Answers
Explanations
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A.
When recommending new disks for a low I/O file server with primary concerns for budget and capacity, the most cost-effective option would be SATA (Serial Advanced Technology Attachment) disks. SATA disks are commonly used in desktops and laptops and provide good performance and reliability for a low cost. They are also widely available and easy to replace, making them a good choice for a low-end server.
FC (Fibre Channel) disks, on the other hand, are high-end disks that are designed for use in high-performance servers that require fast I/O and low latency. They are also significantly more expensive than SATA disks, which may make them cost-prohibitive for a low I/O file server.
SCSI (Small Computer System Interface) disks are also high-performance disks, but they are typically used in larger servers that require more I/O and have a higher number of users. Like FC disks, they are more expensive than SATA disks and may not be necessary for a low I/O file server.
SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) disks are similar to SCSI disks in terms of performance and reliability, but they are designed to be more scalable and flexible. They are also more expensive than SATA disks and may not be necessary for a low I/O file server.
In summary, the administrator should recommend SATA disks as they provide good performance and reliability for a low cost, making them a cost-effective option for a low I/O file server with primary concerns for budget and capacity.
