Key Component of Strong Internal Control Environment | CRISC Exam

Key Component of Strong Internal Control Environment

Prev Question Next Question

Question

Which of the following is a key component of strong internal control environment?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

B.

Segregation of duties (SOD) is a key component to maintaining a strong internal control environment because it reduces the risk of fraudulent transactions.

When duties for a business process or transaction are segregated it becomes more difficult for fraudulent activity to occur because it would involve collusion among several employees.

Incorrect Answers: A: An RMIS can be a very effective tool in monitoring all risk factors that impact the enterprise.

The danger is that many important classes of risk may be omitted from consideration by the system.

hence it doesn't ensure strong internal control environment.

C: Manual controls usually not form strong internal control environment.

By not automating SOD controls, there is, potentially, the issue of these controls becoming a barrier in serving the customer.

As manual authorizations are often time consuming and require another step in any business process, this takes time away from serving the customer.

Automated compliance solutions aim to provide enterprises with timely and efficient internal controls that do not disrupt their normal business process.

D: It is not directly related in maintaining strong internal control environment.

The automated tools are typically used to address SOD and also to provide the enterprise with reporting functionality on SOD violations (i.e., detective controls) and to put in place preventive controls.

The key component of a strong internal control environment is segregation of duties (SoD). SoD refers to the practice of separating the responsibilities for authorizing, recording, and reviewing transactions among different individuals or groups. By separating these duties, organizations can reduce the risk of errors, fraud, or abuse.

For example, suppose an organization has only one person responsible for both approving and processing purchase orders. In that case, there is a high risk that the individual could abuse their authority by approving fictitious purchases, stealing cash, or accepting kickbacks. On the other hand, if the organization separates these duties, one person can approve purchase orders, and another person can process them, reducing the risk of fraudulent activities.

Other internal control components that complement SoD include manual controls and automated tools. Manual controls include policies, procedures, and physical controls that are performed by humans, such as reconciling accounts, reviewing reports, or physically locking up assets. Automated tools, such as software applications, can also provide additional layers of control by automating routine tasks, monitoring transactions, and generating alerts or reports when exceptions occur.

However, it's essential to note that strong internal controls are not just about implementing tools or procedures; they require a cultural shift that values accountability, transparency, and ethical behavior. To establish a robust internal control environment, organizations must involve all levels of management, provide adequate resources, and continuously monitor and assess the effectiveness of their controls.