Intercepted Communications: Understanding a Stealthy Attack

Intercepted Communications

Prev Question Next Question

Question

Which of the following BEST describes an attack where communications between two parties are intercepted and forwarded to each party with neither party being aware of the interception and potential modification to the communications?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

B.

The attack described in the question is a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, which is best described as a type of cyber attack where a third party intercepts the communication between two parties and potentially modifies it without either party's knowledge.

An attacker in a MitM attack may intercept communication by compromising the network traffic between the two parties or by placing themselves between the two parties in order to eavesdrop on their communication. Once the attacker has intercepted the communication, they may modify it in any way they choose, potentially leading to disastrous consequences.

Spear phishing, URL hijacking, and transitive access are not the same as a MitM attack. Spear phishing is a type of phishing attack that targets a specific individual or organization, whereas URL hijacking involves redirecting a user from a legitimate website to a fake website. Transitive access refers to access to a resource through another resource, such as accessing a server through a compromised workstation.

Therefore, the correct answer to the question is B. Man-in-the-Middle.