Secure Software Development: Increasing Software Security through Vulnerability Removal

Software Review Processes for Enhanced Security

Question

Which of the following software review processes increases the software security by removing the common vulnerabilities, such as format string exploits, race conditions, memory leaks, and buffer overflows?

Answers

Explanations

Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer

A. B. C. D.

review is performed in the following forms: Pair programming Informal walkthrough Formal inspection Answer: C is incorrect.

A peer review is an examination.

A code review is a systematic examination of computer source code, which searches and resolves issues occurred in the initial development phase.

It increases the software security by removing common vulnerabilities, such as format string exploits, race conditions, memory leaks, and buffer overflows.

A code process in which author and one or more colleagues examine a work product, such as document, code, etc., and evaluate technical content and quality.

According to the Capability Maturity Model, peer review offers a systematic engineering practice in order to detect and resolve issues occurring in the software artifacts, and examination of a software product, software process, or a set of software processes for assessing compliance with specifications, standards, contractual agreements, or other specifications.

The software review process that increases software security by removing common vulnerabilities such as format string exploits, race conditions, memory leaks, and buffer overflows is code review.

Code review is the process of reviewing the source code of software to identify and correct errors or vulnerabilities. During a code review, a team of developers or security experts analyze the code line by line to identify potential issues such as the ones mentioned in the question. By identifying and correcting these issues early in the development process, code review can help prevent security vulnerabilities from being introduced into the software.

Management review, peer review, and software audit review are also important software review processes, but they are not specifically focused on identifying and removing security vulnerabilities. Management review is a process in which management reviews the overall project plan, budget, and progress. Peer review is a process in which team members review each other's work for quality and consistency. Software audit review is a process in which an external auditor reviews the software development process to ensure compliance with standards and regulations.

In summary, code review is the most appropriate software review process for identifying and removing common security vulnerabilities in software.