Leasing Dark Fiber vs. MPLS Connection
Question
A law office has been leasing dark fiber from a local telecommunications company to connect a remote office to company headquarters.
The telecommunications company has decided to discontinue its dark fiber product and is offering an MPLS connection, which the law office feels is too expensive.
Which of the following is the BEST solution for the law office?
Answers
Explanations
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.D.
The law office is currently using dark fiber leased from a local telecommunications company to connect a remote office to its headquarters. However, the telecommunications company has decided to discontinue its dark fiber product and is offering an MPLS connection, which the law office feels is too expensive.
In this scenario, the BEST solution for the law office would be to use a site-to-site VPN.
A site-to-site VPN is a type of VPN that allows two or more networks to be connected securely over the internet. With a site-to-site VPN, the law office can establish a secure connection between its remote office and headquarters using the internet instead of leased dark fiber. This would eliminate the need for the law office to lease dark fiber from the telecommunications company and would also provide a cost-effective solution.
Remote access VPN, VLAN, and VPN concentrator are not the BEST solutions in this scenario.
Remote access VPN is used to provide secure remote access to individual users. This is not suitable for connecting entire networks, such as the remote office and headquarters.
VLANs are used to divide a single physical network into multiple logical networks. While VLANs can be used to segment network traffic, they are not suitable for connecting remote networks.
VPN concentrator is a device that is used to manage multiple VPN connections. While a VPN concentrator can be used to manage the site-to-site VPN connections, it is not a solution for connecting remote networks.
