A vSAN administrator wants to implement end-to-end prioritization of vSAN traffic across the network in a shared network infrastructure that is using vSphere Distributed Switches (VDS)
Which two can help achieve this objective? (Choose two.)
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D. E.BC.
The objective is to implement end-to-end prioritization of vSAN traffic across the network in a shared network infrastructure using vSphere Distributed Switches (VDS). To achieve this objective, two options can be considered from the given answer choices:
A. Configure CoS or DSCP with high priority tag at the VDS and equivalent in the physical network. This option involves configuring Class of Service (CoS) or Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) with high priority tags at the VDS and the physical network to ensure that vSAN traffic is prioritized over other network traffic. CoS and DSCP are quality of service (QoS) mechanisms used to prioritize network traffic. With this approach, vSAN traffic will be given priority over other types of network traffic. This option requires coordination between the network team and the vSAN administrator to ensure that the configuration is consistent across the entire network infrastructure.
C. Enable Network I/O Control and allocate higher shares for vSAN traffic. This option involves enabling Network I/O Control (NIOC) and allocating higher shares for vSAN traffic. NIOC is a feature that allows the vSphere administrator to prioritize network traffic by allocating shares to different types of traffic. By allocating higher shares to vSAN traffic, it will be given priority over other types of network traffic. This option can be easily implemented by the vSAN administrator and does not require coordination with the network team.
Options B, D, and E are not relevant to achieving the objective of implementing end-to-end prioritization of vSAN traffic across the network.
B. Enable jumbo frames for vSAN VMkernel ports and configure LACP for optimal load balancing. This option is related to configuring jumbo frames and Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP) for vSAN traffic. Jumbo frames allow larger packet sizes to be used, which can increase network throughput. LACP allows multiple network links to be aggregated into a single logical link, which can increase bandwidth and provide redundancy. While these configurations can improve the performance and reliability of vSAN traffic, they do not directly address the objective of implementing end-to-end prioritization of vSAN traffic.
D. Configure multiple vSAN VMkernel interfaces to load balance across multiple uplinks. This option involves configuring multiple vSAN VMkernel interfaces to load balance vSAN traffic across multiple uplinks. While this can improve the performance of vSAN traffic, it does not address the objective of implementing end-to-end prioritization of vSAN traffic.
E. Enable network resource pool at the VDS level to prioritize vSAN traffic. This option involves enabling a network resource pool at the VDS level to prioritize vSAN traffic. A network resource pool is a mechanism that allows network traffic to be prioritized within a virtual switch. While this can help prioritize vSAN traffic within the virtual switch, it does not address the objective of implementing end-to-end prioritization of vSAN traffic across the network.
In summary, the two options that can help achieve the objective of implementing end-to-end prioritization of vSAN traffic across the network in a shared network infrastructure that is using vSphere Distributed Switches (VDS) are: A. Configure CoS or DSCP with high priority tag at the VDS and equivalent in the physical network. C. Enable Network I/O Control and allocate higher shares for vSAN traffic.