Which feature of EIGRP is not supported in OSPF?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.A.
EIGRP and OSPF are two popular routing protocols used in enterprise networks. While both protocols are designed to perform similar functions, there are some key differences between them.
One of the main differences between EIGRP and OSPF is the way they handle load balancing. EIGRP allows for load balancing of unequal-cost paths, which means that traffic can be spread across multiple paths that have different metrics. This can help to optimize network performance and improve overall efficiency.
On the other hand, OSPF does not support load balancing of unequal-cost paths. OSPF only supports load balancing over multiple equal-cost paths, which means that traffic can be distributed across multiple paths that have the same metric.
Option A in the question, load balancing of unequal-cost paths, is a feature that is supported in EIGRP but not in OSPF. Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.
Option B, load balancing over four equal-cost paths, is a feature that is supported in both EIGRP and OSPF. However, it is important to note that the number of equal-cost paths that can be used for load balancing may vary depending on the specific implementation and configuration of the routing protocol.
Option C, using interface bandwidth to determine the best path, is a feature that is supported in both EIGRP and OSPF. However, the specific metrics and algorithms used to calculate the best path may differ between the two protocols.
Option D, per-packet load balancing over multiple paths, is a feature that is not commonly supported in either EIGRP or OSPF. Instead, most implementations of these protocols use per-flow load balancing, which means that traffic is distributed across multiple paths based on the source and destination IP addresses of the packets.