Which of the following would be MOST helpful to an information security management team when allocating resources to mitigate exposures?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.C.
Of the options presented, the MOST helpful to an information security management team when allocating resources to mitigate exposures would be the results of risk assessment.
Risk assessment is the process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating potential risks to an organization's assets, and determining the probability and potential impact of those risks. By conducting a comprehensive risk assessment, an organization can identify its most significant risks, evaluate the adequacy of existing controls, and prioritize the allocation of resources to mitigate those risks.
Internal audit findings may also provide valuable information about an organization's risk exposure, but they are typically focused on assessing the effectiveness of internal controls rather than identifying and evaluating risks.
Relevant risk case studies can be helpful in illustrating how other organizations have addressed similar risks, but they may not provide sufficient information for an organization to make informed decisions about how to allocate its resources.
Penetration testing results can be helpful in identifying specific vulnerabilities in an organization's systems or applications, but they may not provide a comprehensive view of an organization's overall risk exposure.
In summary, while all of the options presented may be helpful in some way, the most valuable information for an information security management team when allocating resources to mitigate exposures would be the results of a comprehensive risk assessment.