Why would a memory dump be admissible as evidence in court?
Click on the arrows to vote for the correct answer
A. B. C. D.B.
A memory dump can be admitted as evidence if it acts merely as a statement of fact.
A system dump is not considered hearsay because it is used to identify the state of the system, not the truth of the contents.
The exclusionary rule mentions that evidence must be gathered legally or it can't be used.
This choice is a distracter.
Source: ANDRESS, Mandy, Exam Cram CISSP, Coriolis, 2001, Chapter 10: Law, Investigation, and Ethics (page 187).
A memory dump is a snapshot of the contents of a computer's memory at a particular point in time. It is essentially a copy of the system's random access memory (RAM), which stores data that is actively being used by the computer's operating system and running applications.
In the context of digital forensics and computer security, memory dumps can be a valuable source of evidence in criminal investigations. Memory analysis can reveal important information about the state of the system at the time of an incident, such as running processes, network connections, and user activity. Memory dumps can also be used to recover deleted or encrypted data that may not be accessible through traditional forensic methods.
Whether or not a memory dump is admissible as evidence in court depends on several factors. One of the main concerns is whether the memory dump was obtained legally and with proper authorization. If the dump was obtained without a warrant or other legal justification, it may be considered inadmissible due to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of evidence obtained through unconstitutional means.
Assuming that the memory dump was obtained legally, it may be admissible as evidence if it meets the standards for relevancy and reliability. The dump must be shown to accurately represent the state of the system at the relevant time, and the information it contains must be relevant to the case at hand. In addition, the analysis and interpretation of the dump must be conducted by a qualified expert who can testify to the accuracy and reliability of the findings.
In conclusion, a memory dump may be admissible as evidence in court if it was legally obtained and meets the standards for relevancy and reliability. It can be used to identify the state of the system at the time of an incident and to recover deleted or encrypted data that may be relevant to a criminal investigation.