The Primary Goal of Post-Incident Reviews for Information Security Incidents

A.

The PRIMARY goal of conducting post-incident reviews for major information security incidents in a maturing incident response program is to identify security program gaps or systemic weaknesses that need correction.

Option A is the correct answer. The purpose of post-incident reviews is to analyze the incident, identify what went wrong, and determine how to improve the incident response process. This includes examining the organization's security program and identifying any gaps or weaknesses that contributed to the incident. By identifying these gaps or weaknesses, the organization can take corrective action and improve its overall security posture.

Option B is incorrect because the primary goal of post-incident reviews is not to prepare notifications to external parties. While notifications to external parties may be necessary after an incident, they are not the primary goal of post-incident reviews.

Option C is incorrect because the primary goal of post-incident reviews is not to identify who should be held accountable for the security incidents. While accountability may be a part of the review process, it is not the primary goal.

Option D is incorrect because the primary goal of post-incident reviews is not just to document and report the root cause of incidents for senior management. While this is an important part of the review process, the primary goal is to identify program gaps or systemic weaknesses that need correction.

In summary, post-incident reviews are a critical component of a maturing incident response program, and the primary goal of these reviews is to identify security program gaps or systemic weaknesses that need correction.